Friday, November 18, 2011
Personal Digital Story Reflection - EDLD 5363
Making this digital photo story was a great addition to my life. I have already shared the project with friends and family because I am so proud of it! The sense of accomplishment of creating something new with technology and also being able to put my life's choices into a photo story was an amazing project!
Saturday, October 22, 2011
EDLD 5301 - Action Research Reflections
EDLD 5301 - Action Research Draft
Action Planning Template | ||||
Goal: To observe if technology does or does not affect student achievement in fact fluency. To have 3rd graders showing fact fluency mastery before entering 4th grade. | ||||
Action Steps(s): | Person(s) Responsible: | Timeline: Start/End | Needed Resources | Evaluation |
Multiplication and Division Fact Pre-Test (25 Questions)
|
Myself |
October 24, 2011 |
Pre-Test Worksheet |
Grade the pre-test
Record pre-test scores |
Establish a list of Internet websites for students to practice their multiplication and division facts.
|
Myself
Computer Tech Aide |
October 24, 2011 |
List of websites
Bookmark websites on student favorites |
Carefully review each worksheet to ensure accuracy, ease of use, and fact fluency |
Create and locate various non-electronic multiplication and division games for the control group to use for fact fluency.
|
Myself
Third Grade Math Team |
October 24, 2011 |
Fact Fluency Games |
Organize fact fluency games so that students can easily access and understand the games. |
Purchase small, hand-held electronic fact fluency games.
Keep Neo2 Cart in my classroom for easy fact fluency practice.
|
Myself
Principal |
October 31, 2011 |
Electronic fact fluency games
Neo2 Cart |
Ensure purchased hand-held games are easy to use, easy to access, and won’t disrupt learning
Make sure students understand how to access the fact fluency quizzes on the Neo2.
|
Implement all internet and electronic fact fluency sources.
Implement all fact fluency games/stations.
|
Myself |
October 31, 2011 – Ongoing throughout research |
Internet websites
Electronic hand-helds
Neo2
Station/Center Games |
Conduct a weekly 25-question quiz over learned multiplication and division facts.
Score quizzes to collect weekly data. |
Multiplication and Division Post-Test (25 questions) |
Myself |
May 21, 2012 |
Post Test Worksheet |
Grade the post-test
Record scores |
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
EDLD 5301 - Week 2 and 3 - Reflections
Thursday, October 6, 2011
How Can Educational Leaders Use Blogs?
Action Research
Thursday, September 22, 2011
EDLD 5306 Course Reflections
2. To the extent that you achieved the outcomes, are they still relevant to the work that you do in your school? Why or why not?
3. What outcomes did you not achieve? What prevented you from achieving them?
4. Were you successful in carrying out the course assignments? If not, what prevented or discouraged you?
5. What did you learn from this course... about yourself, your technology and leadership skills, and your attitudes?
Upon making the decision to obtain my Master’s Degree in Educational Technology Leadership, I did not feel very informed as to what exactly I would be learning. Would I be learning more on the curve of software or facilitating technology integration in the classrooms? EDLD 5360 has helped me realize I will be doing it all. The first two weeks of the course were tough, but made more sense the more I practiced what I was accomplishing. I wanted to understand different components of social networking and have a better grasp of how to utilize technology in my classroom. The course exceeded my expectations and envisioned outcomes. I learned so much useful technology information that I hope to continue and prosper above and beyond what was taught. I also wanted to learn more about the Technology Standards. This course, as stated before, helped achieve that desire. I learned much more about the standards than I would have ever sought on my own time.
My classroom is full of very diverse learners. I work hard daily to reach each and every learner. I am teaching the 21st Century digital natives and must realize that my ‘normal’ way of teaching is no longer reaching the rigor that is required of me (and my test scores). The technology I learned in EDLD 5360 is a great jump start in the direction of raising rigor. For example, I am attending training next month over the district’s blogging website. Had I not taken this course, I would not have given blogging a second thought in my classroom; now I can’t wait to get started! I have so many ideas and hope that this ‘digital learning’ will help my students stay motivated, encouraged, and meet all academic standards. Another concept that I mastered/achieved was becoming more aware of Internet safety and ethics. I feel much more prepared to allow my students on the Internet with just the right amount of freedom. I have already developed a lesson that will be presented before any students are allowed to have free reign on the Internet while at school. I feel the information presented in EDLD 5360 was extremely relevant for the work I do in my school.
During this course, I do not feel there were any outcomes I did not achieve. However, I am a life long learner/educator and feel there is always more to learn. I may not have had any specific outcomes not met for this course, but I will always be on the journey to find new ways to teach, to learn, and to provide support. As technology grows in our classrooms and for our students, I feel the need to research and absorb all that I can. If I am always on the hunt for new ways to integrate technology, then I will always have an outcome I am yearning to meet.
I often find myself wondering why in the world I am attempting my Master’s Degree. I am a full time educator, a single Mom, and just trying to survive on a daily basis. If I learned anything during this first Educational Technology course, it was to pace myself and my assignments. My personal motto has become “One day at a time”. I was successful in completing all of my coursework, but not without a few less hours of sleep. I have been out of college for five years, but this course was my first online course. I came to realize there is a big difference between self-teaching online and listening to a lecturer. The coursework had a few ‘heavier’ weeks than others, therefore I tried my best to always look ahead to future weeks and plan accordingly. I am very proud of myself for completing my first course and I hope I can continue my stamina and enthusiasm.
If I was told to classify myself in a technology category, I would place myself in the intermediate level. I am involved with social networking, I blog on a regular basis, and I use mediocre technology in my classroom. Yet, this course made me take a step back and see that what I am doing is not enough to keep up with the digital natives I am teaching. Not only am I going to need to incorporate more rigorous and in depth technology, but I am going to need to step up my leadership skills. My Internship Plan showed me where I need to further develop and where my strengths in leadership already are. My attitude towards my Master’s program is upbeat and motivated, yet I could see myself getting tired and bogged down very easily. I will strive to take one day at a time, be a continual learner, and help to also motivate the technology immigrants (fellow teachers) who surround me on a daily basis.
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
The National Education Technology Plan
The NETP also address professional development and training for educators. The plan states all teachers must be fully engaged in their own professional technology research as well as take an active role in what their campus/district is offering. Teaching should be a team activity. Gone are the days where teachers worked alone, didn’t communicate with parents, and tried to create every lesson with pencil and paper. In the technology plan, teachers will work with students to create lessons, help communicate with peers, and also to reach out to the ‘hard-to-reach’ parents. Professional development should no longer be a sit-down and take notes type of presentation. All educators should have hands-on learning experiences, continuous support, and easy to access online environments.
Web Conference Summary
Monday, August 29, 2011
District Technology Plan
District: Garland Independent School District
When looking at the Garland Independent School District (GISD) Technology Plan, the budget given for Educator Preparation and Development (Professional Development) is $750,000. The district technology plan states they provide ongoing professional development during the school day as well as after. Each month the technology department offers 15-30 hours of professional development in various areas. As a GISD Employee, I feel I am given plenty of professional development opportunities to further my knowledge and to provide an energetic learning environment for my students. Another way Garland ISD provides professional development is by allowing teachers to teach one another. Each campus has at least one Technology Integration Coach. This person provides on-going and on-site help with professional development as well as technology in all curriculum areas. Each campus also has a Campus Technology Assistant (CTA) on-site. This person is in charge of keeping an inventory of all hardware and instructional software. This person is also responsible for repairing minor hardware and software issues. GISD is a very large district and must keep close watch on their technology services in order to provide the best and more up-to-date services for their students. The CTA will also perform assessment data on each student during the school year to ensure student learning. This data is also given to the teacher’s to create their own data spreadsheets. . One way the district evaluates progress of their technology programs is to implement technology into certain classrooms and campuses. Once the pilot is complete, data and assessments are performed. Technology that was high scoring and had a significant positive impact on student learning is then distributed throughout the district. If the technology is negatively evaluated, it is either re-designed or thrown out. As a GISD employee I had no idea our Technology Plan was so well designed and carried out.